Google’s decision to disable the &num=100 parameter triggers sharp drops in impressions, rankings, and overall keyword visibility.
Between September 12 and 14, Google made a single technical change that sent shockwaves across the SEO industry. Google quietly disabled the support for the &num=100 parameter from its URLs, restricting the search results per page to the standard 10. Previously, this parameter allowed search results to display up to 100 results per page.
Although it’s a small technical alteration, it has made a disruptive change in how impressions, keyword visibility, and rankings are recorded in Google Search Console (GSC) and across leading rank-tracking platforms. As per some early reports, more than 87.7% lost impressions, and around 76.6% of the websites lost unique keyword visibility.
While the update highly impacted SEO tracking, it has brought some positive clarity, especially for the agencies operating a Pay-For-Performance SEO model, ensuring more accurate visibility metrics and fairer performance-based evaluations.
The &num=100 parameter was undocumented by a widely used user modification criterion that allowed Google to display 100 search results on a single page instead of the default 10. For many years, professionals like SEO experts, data analysts, and other third-party tools have relied on this parameter of data collection and analysis.
Why &num=100 mattered?
Note: Google never authenticated the use of the parameter, but in the Google SEO environment, it was an industry standard. It was quietly built into countless rank-tracking APIs, scrapers, and data pipelines.
If we go by numbers:
Metric | Observation | Impact |
Impressions | More than 87.7% of the websites saw a decline in ranking on Google Search Console. | Overall visibility appears reduced; not necessarily due to ranking drops, but fewer tracked keywords |
Unique Ranking terms, keywords | Around 76.6% of the websites lost their unique ranking terms. | Lower-ranked terms no longer reported; keyword visibility reduced across reports |
Average Position | Many websites noticed improvements in average rankings | Reporting artifact: deep-page keywords (pages 3+) removed, making averages look better than reality |
Type of Keyword (Short-Mid Tail) | Most affected | High-competition keywords with multiple pages of results lost visibility in reports |
Long tail keyword | Less impacted | Rankings typically within the visible top 10; niche queries maintain reported positions. |
Fewer results now appear in the top 3 pages of SERP and beyond, while more surface in the top 3 and on page 1. This means rankings now reflect actual positions without any impact from the &num=100
On September 10, 2025, SEO professionals started noting some abnormalities in ranking behavior. It appended that $num=100 no longer returned 100 results. Instead, Google disabled it and set it to only 10 results per page.
It created confusion, and within a span of two days:
At first, everyone thought it was a bug. But later, it was confirmed that “Google has disabled or removed the &num=100 parameter”.
This change is having a huge impact on the data collection landscape, majorly impacting rank trackers, search console metrics, and SEO professionals who mainly rely on historical visibility trends.
The removal of &num=100 can be called a type of reset of how SEO data is gathered, analyzed, and reported. This change can completely change the SEO data scenario as:
For retrieving 100 results, you will now need 10 separate requests. It means higher API costs, maximum server bandwidth, and slow data processing.
SEO tools now have to reduce their visibility range. Many tools will now track only the top 20 or top 30 results instead of 100. It also uses restrictions on how SEOs analyze competitors or measure content depth across the SERP.
As visibility metrics begin to shrink, it means the data accuracy will likely improve. Google Search Console will now prioritize actual user visibility and not just the inflated scraping impressions.
Google’s decision is also part of a larger strategy to constrain automated data harvesting for AI. By turning off &num=100, Google limits mass scraping of SERPs by AI platforms that were collecting data to train their AI.
The removal of &num=100 brings various changes in Google Search Console metrics, such as:
Google keeps on changing its algorithms, policies, and metrics. The best way to survive under new constraints, especially professionals doing Pay For Performance SEO, is to prioritize precise metrics and performance-driven strategies.
Rather than focusing solely on impressions or ranked keyword counts, look to:
Rather than targeting low-impact keyword sets, prioritize top-page keywords reflected mainly in Page #1 of the SERP. Instead of ranking for 2000 keywords, focus on just 50 high-intent and conversion-oriented terms. The pay-for-performance SEO model rewards rankings that matter, so emphasizing quality rather than volume is driving a more measurable impact.
As deep-ranking tracking isn’t as easy, broaden keyword research through different tools:
Over the past year, Google has made many changes to how the content is seen and ranked. The main reason is that it now only rewards high-quality and authoritative content. So, focus more on:
Note that Google did not release any official statement regarding this, but there could be three major reasons behind removing the &num=100 parameter.
The biggest challenge with the &num=100 parameter was that it enabled bots to crawl instantly and identify thousands of search results. Removing it prevents data scraping and protects the integrity of SERP.
Eliminating inflated impressions means Search Console only prioritizes real-user activity, improving data reliability.
As AI search becomes a new normal, Google is trying to prevent bulk data access that is likely to be used for competitive training or result simulation.
With this change, Google is clearly focusing more on SERP data protection with various AI restrictions and safe browsing.
The removal of &num=100 is clearly one of the biggest technical changes Google has made in the last few years. From dropping search results from 100 to 10, Google is trying to provide “real” and more accurate rankings for users and SEO tracking. Although it is true that overnight, the way we collect, interpret, and report visibility data has shifted. But, you need to remember that:
With the removal of &num=100, only the rankings and keyword counts are dropped, not the actual rankings or traffic. This change is just an adjustment to how performance tracking actually looks.
Want to achieve measurable success in this changing Google landscape? Choose ResultFirst, your expert Pay for Performance agency that guarantees to align your SEO strategies with Google’s latest updates and best practices. With years of experience in providing professional SEO services, we focus on transparency, accuracy, and performance-driven SEO strategies to maximize your visibility across all search platforms.
The parameter &num=100 enables Google to show up to 100 search results per page, which is very useful for rank tracking, historical benchmarking, and fast data gathering by SEOs and analytics tools.
Websites experienced drops in impressions and the number of unique keywords through which they were visible, while average positions improved artificially. Clicks stayed at the same level, thus reflecting the real user behavior and, at the same time, confirming that there were no inflated tracking data.